← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23203/2015disposed of

Satheesh S. v. Special Deputy Tahsildar (Rr)

2015-08-13Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/22ND SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23203 of 2015 (A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- SATHEESH S., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.SAHADEVAN, SATHEESH BHAVAN, AYIRIKODE, CHERIYAKONNI, ARUVIKKARA VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), KSFE LIMITED, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 011.

2. KSFE LIMITED, PEROORKADA BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 011. BY ADVS. SRI.V.N.SASIDHARAN, SC SRI.ALEXANDER.C.V., SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 23203 of 2015 (A) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT P1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 29/06/15 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT P2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20/07/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE Msv/

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 23203 of 2015 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, challenging revenue recovery proceedings to recover the dues to the 2nd respondent has approached this Court.

2.

The only prayer made by the petitioner before this Court is to provide an instalment facility to discharge the entire liability.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is given 12 instalments to discharge the entire liability demanded as per Ext.P1 including future interest and incidental expenses starting from 5.9.2015. If the petitioner commits default in remitting any of the instalments, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/ A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE jm/