High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23242/2015disposed of

Mruthula P. v. The District Educational Officer

2015-08-03Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2015/12TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 23242 OF 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- MRUTHULA P.

D/O.RAMANATHAN H.S.A(SANSKRIT) YOGINI MATHA GIRLS' HIGH SCHOOL KOLLENGODE CHITTUR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT RESIDING AT "GANGAMRUTHAM"

ALAMPALLAM, KOLLENGODE.P.O.

CHITTUR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.

SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S):

--------------- 1.THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD-678001

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 23242 OF 2015 (E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER AS H.S.A (SANSKRIT) IN YOGINI MATHA GIRLS' HIGH SCHOOL KOLLENGODE DATED 06.09.2010 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.06.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 EXT.P4:TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT ISSUED ON SENDING EXT.-P3 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.23242 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner who was appointed as H.S.A. (Sanskrit), is aggrieved by the denial of approval to the said appointment. It is pointed out that in connection with the said grievance of the petitioner, the Manager of the School has preferred Ext.P3 revision before the 2nd respondent. The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition expeditiously after hearing the petitioner and the Manager.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition expeditiously at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioner as also the Manager of the School. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns