High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23243/2015disposed of

Sreenegesh P.R. v. The Director Of Public Instruction

2015-08-03Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2015/12TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 23243 OF 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- SREENEGESH P.R.

S/O.LATE RAMAN,HSA(ENGLISH) KKM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL VANDITHAVALAM, CHITTUR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.

SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S):

--------------- THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 23243 OF 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER WITH EFFECT FROM 29.09.2007 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVED APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 04.06.2009 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.23243 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner who has been promoted as H.S.A. (English), is aggrieved by the denial of approval to the appointment that was effected with effect from 29.09.2007 by Ext.P1 order. It is not in dispute that his appointment with effect from 04.06.2009 has been approved as evidenced by Ext.P2 order. Aggrieved by the denial of approval to the appointment from 29.09.2010, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 revision petition before the respondent. The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision expeditiously after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I direct the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioner as also the Manager of the School. The

W.P.(C).No.23243 of 2015 petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the respondent for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns