High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23256/2015disposed of

K.S.Remesh v. The Deputy Tahsildar (R.R), Meenachiltaluk

2015-07-313 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2015/9TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23256 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- K.S.RAMESH, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.SIVASANKARAN, KOCHUKUNNEL HOUSE, MEVADA.P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI SRI.JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R), MEENACHIL TALUK, PALAI. PIN-686 010

2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. PIN-686 001

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001.

BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 23256 of 2015 (F) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 23256 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging revenue recovery proceedings based on the assessment order. Petitioner submits that he is contemplating to file an appeal against the assessment order and therefore revenue recovery proceedings may be deferred.

Taking note of the facts and circumstances, following directions are issued:

(i) Petitioner shall remit 75,000/- on or before 12.08.2015 and ₹ another sum of 75,000/- within a further period of three weeks ₹ thereafter.

(ii) Revenue recovery proceedings shall be deferred for a period of 2 months to enable the petitioner to work out alternative remedy based on satisfaction of the above condition. This writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.