← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23392/2015disposed of

Manager, Perumanna A.L.P School v. State Of Kerala

2015-08-04Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23392 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MANAGER AGED 65 YEARS PERUMANNA A.L.P SCHOOL, PERUMANNA P.O.

KOZHIKODE - 673 019.

BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-:

--------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 303..

2. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE RURAL, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

3. SOUMYA K.

LPSA, PERUMANNA A.L.P SCHOOL, KOZHIKODE - 673 019. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 23392 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2015. EXHIBIT P2.

A COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 01.06.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3.

A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A.NO.812/2015 DATED 09.04.2015.

EXHIBIT P4.

A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.C. NO.27701/14 DATED 27.10.2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 23392 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the manager of the school, has appointed the 3rd respondent as a teacher of the school. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the delay occasioned by the 2nd respondent in taking a decision with regard to approval of Ext.P1 appointment order, issued in favour of the 3rd respondent. It is therefore, that the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to take an expeditious decision in respect of approval of Ext.P1 appointment order.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision with regard to the approval of the 3rd respondent pursuant to Ext.P1 appointment order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a

-2W.P.(C). No. 23392 of 2015 copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das