← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23402/2015disposed of

Manager v. State Of Kerala

2015-08-04Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23402 of 2015 (A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MANAGER AGED 68 YEARS ATHMA VIDYA SANGHAM U.P SCHOOL, CHERUVANNUR, KOLATHARA KOZHIKODE BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 303

2. ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE 673 001

3. NIKHIL C.K LPSA, ATHMA VIDYA SANGHAM U.P SCHOOL, CHERUVANNUR KOZHIKODE 673 001 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 23402 of 2015 (A) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01-06-2015 EXT.P2 A COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 01/06/2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3 A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A NO 812/2015 DATED 09/04/2015 EXT.P4 A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.C NO 27701/14 DATED 27/10/2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 23402 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the manager of the school, has appointed the 3rd respondent as a teacher of the school. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the delay occasioned by the 2nd respondent in taking a decision with regard to approval of Ext.P1 appointment order, issued in favour of the 3rd respondent. It is therefore, that the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to take an expeditious decision in respect of approval of Ext.P1 appointment order.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision with regard to the approval of the 3rd respondent pursuant to Ext.P1 appointment order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a

-2W.P.(C). No. 23402 of 2015 copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das