← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23425/2015disposed of

Geetha M.K v. State Of Kerala

2015-08-04Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937 ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- 1.GEETHA.M.K.

MANAKKEKUDI RAYAMANGALAM PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683545.( CONTINGENT WORKER (CLR) PERUMBAVOOR MUNICIPALITY)

2. JAMEELA P.M.

POONUKUDIYIL ASAMANNOOR P.O., ODAKALI PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683 549 -DO3. LATHIKA.A.A KAROTTUKUDY HOUSE, HARIJAN COLONY KADUVAL PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683 542 -DO4. LEELA.T KANICHAPARAMBU ELAMBAKAPPILY P.O PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683 546 -DO5. SHALINA V.M VATTAPARA HOUSE METHALA P.O KURUPUMPADI (VIA) PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683 545 -DO-

6. AYYAMMA.M KUMARIVALSAM MANAKKEKUDI ELAMBAKAPPILY P.O AIMURY PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683546 -DO7. AJITHA P.A KIZHAKKEKUNNEL HOUSE MORAKKALA KARA EAST PALLIKKARA PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683565 -DO8. SINI P.N PULICKAL HOUSE ERUMELYKARA KUMARAPURAM P.O PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683 565 -DO- BY ADVS.SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN SRI.M.SALIM SRI.R.SRINATH SRI.V.M.JACOB RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

2. DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS PUBLIC OFFICE COMPLEX THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033 3.PERUMBAVOOR MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY MUNICIPAL SECRETARY, PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683542

4. CHAIRMAN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, PERUMBAVOOR MUNICIPALITY PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM-683542 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A BY SRI.V.M.KURIAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF 3RD RESPONDENT NO.PH112480/11 DATED 28.12.2012 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 7TH PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 8TH PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.2015 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.23425 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 04th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners, who are CLR workers under the 3rd respondent Municipality have approached the Government with a request for regularisation in service. Exts.P2 to P9 are the representations preferred by the petitioners which are pending before the 1st respondent. It is stated that, the said representations were submitted by the petitioners through the respondent Municipality, and the respondent Municipality has also recommended the case of the petitioners for regularisation. Under the circumstances, the limited prayer of the petitioners at this stage is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the said representations expeditiously after hearing the petitioners.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 to P9 representations preferred by the petitioners within a period of three months from the

W.P.(C).No.23425 of 2015 date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioners. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns