Manager, S.V.A.U.P.School, Chelembra v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23439 of 2015 (D) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MANAGER, S.V.A.U.P.SCHOOL, CHELEMBRA AGED 64 YEARS PULLIPARAMBA P.O., MALAPPURAM-673 634.

BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 303.

2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PARAPANAGADI, MALAPPURAM-673 303.

3. RENUKA K.

UPSA, S.V.A.U.P.SCHOOL, CHELEMBRA PULLIPARAMBA P.O., MALAPPURAM-673 634.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. LOWSY A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 23439 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1-6-2015. EXT.P2 :

A COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 1-6-2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 :

A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WA.NO.812/2015 DATED 9-4-2015. EXT.P4 :

A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC.NO.27701/14 DATED 27-10-2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 23439 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the manager of the school, has appointed the 3rd respondent as a teacher of the school. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the delay occasioned by the 2nd respondent in taking a decision with regard to approval of Ext.P1 appointment order, issued in favour of the 3rd respondent. It is therefore, that the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to take an expeditious decision in respect of approval of Ext.P1 appointment order.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision with regard to the approval of the 3rd respondent pursuant to Ext.P1 appointment order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a

-2W.P.(C). No. 23439 of 2015 copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das