P.H.Sreelesh Kumar v. The Assistant Executive Engineer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23523 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------

1. P.H.SREELESH KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. HARIHARAN, PUTHENPURAKKAL HOUSE, KUMBALAM SOUTH, KUMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM.

2.

HYMAVATHY HARIHARAN, AGED 63 YEARS W/O. HARIHARAN, PUTHENPURAKKAL HOUSE, KUMBALAM SOUTH, KUMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM.

3. RAVEENDRAN K.P., AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAPPAN PILLA, KOPRAMBIL HOUSE, KUMBALAM P.O.,ERNAKULAM - 682 506.

4. SANTHOSH P.K., AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. KOCHO.

PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, KUMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 506.

5.

SUJITH P.C., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. CHITHRANGADAN, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE KUMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 506.

6. RATHEESH K.S., AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. SADANANDAN, OPRAMBIL HOUSE, KUMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 506.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.VINOD MS.JENCY SUSAN JOSE SRI.V.SRI NATH.

RESPONDENT(S):

-------------- THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER SUPPLY SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, EROOR, SOUTH, TRIPUNITHURA - 682 306.

BY SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rvs.

WP(C).No. 23523 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------ EXT. P1 - THE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO. 10889/2011. EXT. P2 - THE COPY OF THE MASS REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DT. 07.07.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------ NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 23523 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners' grievance seems to be that Ext.P2 mass representation filed on 07.07.2015 has not been considered till date by the respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the respondent to consider the mass representation in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj