K.P.Sandya v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26269 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ K.P.SANDYA, AGED 33 YEARS, W/O SUBRAHMANYAN, KARUKAYIL PARAMBU, MANGATTIRI (P.O), THIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISH RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676505.

2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676505.

3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505.

4. SATHEESH C.T, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O C.T. VELAYUDHAN, CHETTIYANTHUDIYIL HOUSE, THRIKANDIYUR AMSOM, MUTHUR DESOM, THIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676101.

R1 TO R3 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR R4 BY ADVS. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE SMT.N.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 26269 of 2013 (G) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 21-10-2013 BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXT. P1(A):

THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21-10-2013 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

--------------------------------------- EXT. R4(A) :

TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 29.6.2013 EXECUTED IN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXT. R4(B) :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 1.10.2013 FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 26269 of 2013 ================== Dated this, the 7th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

This writ petition has been filed seeking police protection alleging threat from the 4th respondent.

2.

An interim order has already been passed by this Court on 12/11/2013.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the interim order had been passed, no untoward incident has happened.

Hence, we close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police, if there is any further cause of action.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp7/12/2015 //True Copy// PS to Judge