High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27482/2010dismissed as infructuous

Pullichira Edavaka Samrakshna Samithy v. Mayyanadu Grama Panchayath & Others

2015-01-20Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/30TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 27482 of 2010 (I) PETITIONER:

PULLICHIRA EDAVAKA SAMRAKSHNA SAMITHY (REG. NO. Q308/2009) EDEN, PULLICHIRA P.O., KOLLAM - 691 304 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, S. AUGUSTINE (REGD NO-Q308/2009) BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.RAJA SRI.R.RANJITH SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR SMT.K.M.NAZREEN RESPONDENTS:

1. MAYYANADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, (SPECIAL GRADE) MAYYANADU P.O., KOLLAM, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. EX-OFFICIO PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND CHAIRMAN, KCZMA, DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SASTHRA BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. FR.LAZAR S.PATTAKKADAVU, PARISH PRIEST, IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH, PULLICHIRA P.O., KOLLAM. ADDL. R4 IMPLEADED:

4. KERALA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, SASTHRA BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

(ADDL.R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 07.09.2010 IN I.A. NO. 12339/2010) R,R3 BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW SUNNY R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR R,R4 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH,SC,COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.S.KALESH R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.HARISH GOPINATH R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.VINAY MENON R,R1 BY ADV. SMT.KVP.JAYALEKSHMY R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.AJAY (IRUMPANAM) R4 BY ADV. SRI.PRAKASH C.VADAKKAN. J., SC, KCZMA R BY SRI. JUSTIN JACOB, GOVERNMENT PLEADER BY SRI. PRAKASH C. VADAKKAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 27482 of 2010 (I) ---------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of January, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in the writ petition and that it has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

/True Copy/ P.A to Judge.

W.P.(Crl.)/W.A. No.

-2-