Reena Sam v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/15TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23712 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- REENA SAM, AGED 44 YEARS, W/O.SAM, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.304, HOYSALA E HOME, KUSUMAGIRI P.O, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS. SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH SMT.DENNIS VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, INFOPARK POLICE STATION, KAKKANAD-682030, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, INFOPARK POLICE STATION, KAKKANAD-682030, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. RAVEENDRAN PILLAI, PALAKKATTU MADOM HOUSE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, KAKKANAD-682030.
5. RADHAMANI AMMA, W/O.RAVEENDRAN PILLAI, PALAKKATTU MADOM HOUSE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, KAKANAD-682030.
R1 TO R3 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 23712 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------- EXT. P1 :
PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LEASE DEED DATED 11-3-2014 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 AND ENGLSIH TRANSLATION.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.23712 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of August 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
2.
Petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging police harassment. Petitioner, who claims to be a tenant of the premises, submits that at the instance of the 4th respondent, the petitioner is being called at the police station. 3.
The learned Government Pleader, after obtaining instructions submits that, a complaint was received from the 4th respondent against the petitioner with regard to which petitioner was called on 03/08/2015. It is submitted that, on 04/08/2015, 4th respondent was also called and statement was recorded. Police, after coming to know that the dispute between the parties is of civil nature, have closed the complaint.
4.
In that view of the matter, we do not intend to issue any direction, as prayed for. This writ petition is closed. (sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr