High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23987/2015disposed of

A. Ranju v. The Kerala State Electricity

2015-08-11Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/20TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23987 of 2015 (W) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- A. RANJU, S/O.AZHAKESAN, GEETHALAYAM, MULLUVILA VADAKKEVILA PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695014

2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION PALLIMUKKU, KOLLAM, PIN 695016

3. THE SUB ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION PALLIMUKKU, KOLLAM, PIN 695016 BY SRI.JAICE JACOB, SC, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 23987 of 2015 (W) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE MAHAZAR PREPARED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT 28.05.2015 P2:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.05.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER P3:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT NO.BB/APTS/KOLLAM/THEFT/2015-16/41 DATED 29.05.2015 UNDER SECTION 126 OF ELECTRICITY ACT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER P4:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 30.05.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT P3 P5:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 05.06.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 23987 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has allegedly filed Ext. P4 objection to Ext. P3 provisional assessment order. The parties are at variance as to whether Ext. P4 objection is filed in time or not.

I permit the petitioner to file a detailed objection to Ext. P3 provisional assessment order within one week from today. Any such objection received shall be dealt with as per law after hearing the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE