← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24043/2015disposed of

Manager, Sree Narayana Vilasam A.U.P School v. State Of Kerala

2015-08-10Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/19TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 24043 OF 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- MANAGER, SREE NARAYANA VILASAM A.U.P SCHOOL, KANNANKARA P.O., CHELANNUR, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673 616. BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS RESPONDENT(S):

----------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 303.

2. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHEVAYUR, KOZHIKODE-PIN- 673 616.

3. A.S.VYSAKH, UPSA, SREE NARAYANA VILASAM, A.U.P SCHOOL KANNANKARA P.O., CHELANNUR, KOZHIKODE- 673 616. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 24043 OF 2015 (E) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01/06/2015. EXT P2- A COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 01/06/2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT P3- A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A NO.812/2015 DATED 09/04/2015. EXT P4- A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC NO.708 DATED 09/01/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 24043 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 10th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the manager of the school, has appointed the 3rd respondent as a teacher of the school. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the delay occasioned by the 2nd respondent in taking a decision with regard to approval of Ext.P1 appointment order, issued in favour of the 3rd respondent. It is therefore, that the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to take an expeditious decision in respect of approval of Ext.P1 appointment order.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision with regard to the approval of the 3rd respondent pursuant to Ext.P1 appointment order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a

-2W.P.(C). No. 24043 of 2015 copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das