← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24061/2015disposed of

Manager, Vaikkilassery U.P. School v. State Of Kerala

2015-08-10Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/19TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24061 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- MANAGER, VAIKKILASSERY U.P. SCHOOL VAIKKILASSERY P.O, VADAKARA KOZHIKODE. PIN-673 104 BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695303

2. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHOMBALA,KOZHIKODE-PIN-673504

3. JIPSA.P.K., UPSA VAIKKILASSERY U.P. SCHOOL VADAKARA KOZHIKODE. PIN-673 104 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 24061 of 2015 (G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2015 EXT.P2:A COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 01.06.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3: A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A.NO.812/2015 DATED 09.04.2015 EXT.P4: A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.C.NO.708/15 DATED 9.1.2015 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 24061 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 10th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the manager of the school, has appointed the 3rd respondent as a teacher of the school. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the delay occasioned by the 2nd respondent in taking a decision with regard to approval of Ext.P1 appointment order, issued in favour of the 3rd respondent. It is therefore, that the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to take an expeditious decision in respect of approval of Ext.P1 appointment order.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision with regard to the approval of the 3rd respondent pursuant to Ext.P1 appointment order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a

-2W.P.(C). No. 24061 of 2015 copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das