Lissy V.T. v. The Principal Officer, Kerala State Seed Farm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/26TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24161 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- LISSY V.T., CASUAL LABOUR, KERALA STATE SEED FARM OKKAL P.O.KALADY- 683 550 RESIDING AT VELUTHEPPALLY HOUSE, OKKAL P.O., KALADY. BY ADVS.SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR SMT.A.K.PREETHA RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE PRINCIPAL OFFICER, KERALA STATE SEED FARM, OKKAL, P.O. KALADY- 683 550.

2. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.

3. PRINCIPAL, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM- 682 030.

4. AMMINI THAMPAN, WORKER, KERALA STATE SEED FARM, OKKAL P.O.KALADY- 683 550.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. LOWSY A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 24161 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT P1TRUE COPY OF EXTRACT OF ADMISSION REGISTER ISSUED BY HOLY FAMILY UP SCHOOL, TABORE.

EXT P2TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF SENIORITY LIST SHOWING THE DETAILS OF EMPLOYEES.

EXT P3TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF SSLC BOOK OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT'S DAUGHTER.

EXT P4TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10/06/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT P5TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10/06/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT P6TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10/06/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 24161 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 17th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is a casual worker under the 1st respondent, seeks regularisation of her service under the 1st respondent. It is her case in the writ petition that, in connection with the claim for regularisation, she has preferred Ext.P5 representation before the 2nd respondent and the limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation preferred by the petitioner, expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation, after hearing the petitioner, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das