← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24183/2015disposed of

Holy Faith Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd., Ekm v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi

2015-08-10Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/19TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24183 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------- HOLY FAITH BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., 34/2353, MAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682025. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH SMT.ROSIE ATHULYA JOSEPH SMT.O.A.NURIYA KUM.SOUMYA PRAKASH MEKHALA M.BENNY RESPONDENTS :

---------------------- ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(2), KOCHI AND ANOTHER.

BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 24183 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT.P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.03.2014 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT.P2TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.03.2014 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT.P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12.

EXHIBIT.P4TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13.

EXHIBIT.P5TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12. EXHIBIT.P6TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 24183 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging Exts.P1 & P2 assessment orders for the years 2011-12 & 2012-13 passed by the 1st respondent. The petitioner has preferred Exts.P3 & P4 appeals along with Exts.P5 & P6 petitions for stay against the said orders.

2.

Heard both the sides.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exts.P5 & P6 after issuing notice to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till a final decision is taken as directed above, all the coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for further steps.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.

Pn