N.L. Anto v. N.A. Lazar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/10TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 28058 of 2012 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------------ N.L. ANTO S/O.N.A LAZAR NEELAMKAVIL HOUSE, PERAMANGALAM TRICHUR BY ADV. SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN RESPONDENTS :
-----------------------
1. N.A. LAZAR, NEELAMKAVIL PERAMANGALAM TRICHUR 680545
2. THANKAMMA LAZAR, W/O. N.A NAZAR NEELAMKAVIL PERAMANGALAM, TRICHUR 680545
3. MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL AND REVENUE, DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TRICHUR 680003
4. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHUR 680003 R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO R3 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MUHAMMED SHAFI M. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 28058 of 2012 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
P1:
COPY OF ORDER DT 16/12/2011.
P2:
COPY OF APPLICATION DT 20/1/2012.
P3:
COPY OF INTIMATION DT 2/6/2012.
P4:
COPY OF MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DT 21/7/2012.
P5:
COPY OF ORDER DT 17/8/2012.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :
NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C) No. 28058 of 2012 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 30th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers :
"i. Call for the records relating to Exhibits P1 to P5.
ii. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or appropriate order to quash/set aside Exhibits P1, P3 and P5.
iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or appropriate order directing the Maintenance Tribunal and Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichur to consider Ext. P2 application on merits and dispose of the same in accordance with law after hearing all the parties concerned.
iv. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or appropriate oder directing the Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007, Trichur to consider and dispose of Ext. P4 appeal in accordance with law.
: 2 :
v. Stay all recovery proceedings against the petitioner in pursuance of Ext. P1 order (C2 18588/11 dated 26.12.2011) and Exts. P3 and P5 orders till the disposal of the above case.
vi. Pass any other order as this Honourable Court deems fit and just and allow the writ petiiton with costs.
2. When the matter came up for consideration on 27.11.2012, the writ petition was admitted granting interim stay, subject to satisfaction of a sum of Rs. 5,000/- within a month. Subsequently, when the matter came up for consideration on 24.10.2014, the matter was referred for mediation to be held at the District Court, Thrissur on 05.11.2014. A report dated 08.11.2014 has now been forwarded to this Court by the District Co-ordinator (District Judge), District Mediation Centre, Thrissur along with agreement executed between the parties. The terms of agreement entered into between on 14.11.2014 are in the following lines ;
v|vòW¥
1. So¤ jNÒ]Rs qoLU kL¡Ÿ]WtLp sLy¡, fËÚ sLy¡ IÐ]vqORa Past and
: 3 :
future maintenance Ss ̈Lp] RoL3⁄4U Rs.1,00,000/- (KqO sƒU qPkLoLNfU) CqOvqORapOU Skq]¤ JRfË]sOU Nationalised Bank -¤ deposit R\pÅV j¤WLRoÐV 1&LU kL¡Ÿ] yÚf]\ÿ]q] ̈OÐO.
SosL¤ maintenance vWp]¤ 2&LU kL¡Ÿ]W¥ ̈V, 1&LU kL¡Ÿ]p]¤ j]ÐV pLRfLqO yUX|pOU sn] ̈OvL¢ A¡zfp]sæL3⁄4fLWOÐO.
2. 2&LU kL¡Ÿ] sLyr]R£ Skq]¤ \]ã] sÕ]ç] v]Ssæ^]¤ j]s j]¤ ̈OÐfLp 83/4 Ry£V krÒVòsU, a]pL¢ 1&LU kL¡Ÿ] pLp BS£Lv]R£ Skq]¤ f}rO IuOf] RWLaO ̈LRoÐOU, ASf yopU 1&LU kL¡Ÿ]pORa Skq]sOU, 2&LU kL¡Ÿ]Wt]¤, 2&LU jNÒV WLq]pLp fËÚ sLyr]R£ Skq]sOoLp] S^Lp]£Lp] j]sj]¤ ̈OÐ 213/4 Ry£V òs3⁄4]sOç 1&LU kL¡Ÿ]pLp BS£LpORa AvWLwU Ku]oOr] R\pÅV So¤ kr ́ 2&LU kL¡Ÿ]Wt]¤ 2&LU jNÒVWLq]pLp fËÚ sLyr] jV j¤WOÐf]jOU CqOkL¡Ÿ]WtOU kqyVkqU yÚf]\ÿ]q] ̈OÐO. a]. vzW¥ kqyVkqU f}rO R\áOÐf]Ss ̈Lp] vqOÐfLp oOuOv¢ R\svOWtOU (Registration D¥RÕRa) 1&LU kL¡Ÿ] y~pU vz]\ÿORWLçLRoÐOU yÚf]\ÿ]q] ̈OÐO.
So¤ kr ́ yUYf]W¥ CSÐ ̈V oPÐOoLy3⁄4]jWU R\pÅO f}¡ ̈OÐf]jOU CqO kL¡Ÿ]WtOU yÚf]\ÿ]q] ̈OÐO.
: 4 :
3. CqO kL¡Ÿ]WtOU fÚ]¤ SWLaf]p]¤ j]sj]¤ ̈OÐfLp IsæL v|vzLq°tOU f¡ ̈°tOU k]¢vs] ̈OÐf]jOU CqO kL¡Ÿ] WtOU yÚf]\ÿ]q] ̈OÐO.
So¤ v|vòW¥ vLp]\ÿO ojô]sL ̈] CSÐ h]vyU o}c]Spx¢ Ry£r]¤ Rv\ÿV CT WqLr]¤ KÕ]aOÐO.
It is seen that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. As such, no further orders are required to be passed in this matter. In the said circumstances, the Writ Petition stands closed, recording the terms of settlement as part of this verdict. The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd