← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34728/2005dismissed

A.C.Subramanian v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-02Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.34728 of 2005 (H) ---------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- A.C.SUBRAMANIAN, ARAKKAL HOUSE, EDAKOCHI, KOCHI-682 006.

BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J.

RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT POF TOURISM, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. KERALA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTAM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL.

R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.B.GOPAKUMAR.

R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

W.P.(C).NO.34728 OF 2005-H APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RANKED LIST OF LASCAR PUBLISHED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 25.6.2003 ISSUED BY THE MANAGER, ARANYA NIVAS, THEKKADY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXT.R2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.KTDC : BM - 236 : 04 : 7 DATED JUNE 16, 2004. EXT.R2(b) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.NOS.1001, 1065 & 1122 OF 2004 DATED 13.9.2004.

EXT.R2(c) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.85966/B1/04/TSM DT.15.6.05. EXT.R2(d) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER No.KTDC/PA(3)/3750/05 DATED 2.9.05.

EXT.R2(e) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.KTDC/PA(3)/GC/05 DATED 25.1.05.

vku/- [ true copy ]

K. Vinod Chandran, J ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34728 of 2005-H ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 02nd day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The prayer in the above writ petition is to report 8 [eight] vacancies of Lascar in the 2nd respondent. The writ petition is of the year 2005. Effectively the prayer has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/- [ true copy ]