High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24444/2015disposed of

Viginees Raju v. State Of Kerala

2015-08-12Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/21ST SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24444 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- VIGINEES RAJU AGED 40 YEARS W/O.RAJU, KALAYIL CHENNOTHU HOUSE, KALLAR P.O. THANNIMOODU, UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.- 695 001

2. COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

3. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ADIMALY, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT-686301.

4. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (GENERAL), PAINAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT-686331.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. LOWSY A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 24444 of 2015 (E) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 05.12.2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.03.2015 THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE LETTER BEARING No.JSP(A)-12/15 DATED 19.05.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 24444 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 12th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is working as a casual sweeper and who seeks regularisation of services under the 3rd respondent, approaches this Court through the present writ petition seeking a direction to the 4th respondent, before whom Ext.P3 representation has been preferred by the 3rd respondent recommending the case of the petitioner for regularisation, to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 representation expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 representation, preferred by the 3rd respondent, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition, together with a copy of this judgment before the 4th respondent for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das