High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24454/2015disposed of

Suresh Babu J. v. The Authorised Officer,Chief Manager, Sbt, Eranhippalam

2015-12-02Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24454 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SURESH BABU J., EF-4-4411, BILATHKULAM HOUSING COLONY, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 006.

BY ADVS.SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER,CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REGIONAL OFFICE, NEAR PASSPORT OFFICE, ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE, KERALA - 673 006.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, ERANHIPALAM BRANCH, NEAR PASSPRT OFFICE, ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE - 673 006.

BY SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADV. SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 24454 of 2015 (F) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 23.6.2015 PUBLISHED IN THE HINDU DAILY DATED 23.6.2015.

EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE BANK DATED 31.7.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................ W.P.(C).No.24454 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2015 J U D G M E N T It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not complied with the directions in the interim order dated 21.11.2015 to pay an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- on or before 30.11.2015. Taking note of the said submission of counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that, the petitioner is not entitled to any discretionary relief from this Court in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Resultantly, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns/02.12.15