Manager, Eravannur A.U.P. School v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/21ST SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24458 of 2015 (F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- MANAGER, ERAVANNUR A.U.P. SCHOOL AGED 61 YEARS ERAVANNUR P.O, NARIKKUNI, KOZHIKODE 673 585.
BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS SMT.S.A.SONET RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 303.
2. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KODUVALLY, KOZHIKODE 673 585.
3. ANUPAMA K HINDI TEACHER, ERAVANNUR A.U.P SCHOOL, ERAVANNUR P.O NARIKKUNI, KOZHIKODE 673 585.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. LOWSY A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 24458 of 2015 (F) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- -------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 13.07.2015. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 13.07.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WA No.812/2015 DATED 09.04.2015 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WP(C) No.27701/14 DATED 27.10.2014.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 24458 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 12th day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is the manager of the school, has appointed the 3rd respondent as a teacher of the school. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the delay occasioned by the 2nd respondent in taking a decision with regard to approval of Ext.P1 appointment order, issued in favour of the 3rd respondent. It is therefore, that the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to take an expeditious decision in respect of approval of Ext.P1 appointment order.
2.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision with regard to the approval of the 3rd respondent pursuant to Ext.P1 appointment order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a
-2W.P.(C). No. 24458 of 2015 copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das