High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24483/2015dismissed

Koliyot Sulaksh v. Regional Transport Officer

2015-09-03Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/12TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24483 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

----------------- KOLIYOT SULAKSH, AGED 42 YEARS S/O.KOLIYOT SURESH, "NANDANAM", KOTTOOLI.P.O KOZHIKODE-673016.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUDHISH SRI.P.B.SAJITH SMT.M.MANJU SMT.E.SILPA RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

------------------

1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, CIVIL STATION.P.O, CALICUT-673020.

2. THE ADDITIONAL REGISTERING AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION, CIVIL STATION.P.O, CALICUT-673020. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 24483 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- P1 TRUE COPY OF INVOICE ISSUED BY T.V.SUNDRAM IYENGAR & SONS LTD,KOZHIKODE DT.3-7-2011 P2 TRUE COPY OF R.C.BOOK OF THE VEHICLE NO:K L 11 AJ 6242 (LMW GOODS VEHICLE) P3 TRUE COPY OF PERMITS ISSUED TO THE VEHICLE KL 11 AJ 6242 BY R.T.O,KOZHIKODE 23-8-11 P4 ORDER ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENTS IN REJECTING THE APPLICATION DT.26/8/13.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.24483 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ext.P4 order passed in terms of Section 52 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is impugned. An appeal lies therefrom under Section 57 of the said Act wherein all the legal and factual contentions could be urged. No case been made out to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court when there is an effective alternate remedy.

2. Any appeal filed within one month from today shall be dealt with by the prescribed authority within two months therefrom. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner as indicated above.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.