High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24510/2015disposed of

George Mathew v. Kerala State Pollution Control Board

2015-08-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24510 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ GEORGE MATHEW AGED 34 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.FIVE STAR PLYWOOD, PANIPARA PO KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH SRI.BIJU VARGHESE ABRAHAM SRI.DILEEP CHANDRAN SRI.ADARSH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DISTRICT OFFICE (ERNAKULAM II), 1ST FLOOR MANNA RESIDENCY, M.C.ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM PIN 683 542.

2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DISTRICT OFFICE (ERNAKULAM II), 1ST FLOOR MANNA RESIDENCY, M.C.ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM PIN 683 542.

BY SRI. M.AJAY, SC, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 24510 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1- TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT TO ESTABLISH ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS P2- TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT TO OPERATE ISUED BY THE RESPONDENTS P3- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 18.6.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15.7.15 P5- TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE PETITONER TO EXHIBIT P4. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 24510 of 2015 (K) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the refusal of renewal of consent to operate a Plywood manufacturing unit, which the petitioner is said to have applied for.

In such circumstances, the application of the petitioner shall be considered after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and a decision shall be taken within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment, if necessary after conducting a physical inspection. If there is any objection raised, the objectors also shall be heard.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj