Krishnakumari v. The Additional Tahsildar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/11TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24517 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------------ KRISHNAKUMARI, AGED 46 YEARS, W/O.BALAN, PAPPANCHALLA, GOVINDAPURAM, MUTHALAMADA-I VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678507.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
1. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678101.
2. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD-678001.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD-678001.
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTHALAMADA-I VILLAGE, MUTHALAMADA, CHITTUR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
5. MADHAVAN, S/O.PONNAN, PAPPANCHALLA, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678507. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 24517 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:
TRUE COPY OF REGISTERED DOCUMENT NO.2508/2012 EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER.
P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.15-3-2015 CAUSED TO BE ISSUED ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER TO 2ND RESPONDENT P3:
TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT.16-4-2015 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO 1ST RESPONDENT WITH NOTICE TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.24517 of 2015 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner, aggrieved by the creation of new Survey Division in re survey Nos.215/5,6 from re-survey No.215/1, has approached this Court.
2. The petitioner appears to have approached the District Survey Superintendent. By Ext.P3, the District Survey Superintendent referred the matter to Additional Tahasildar, Chittoor. In view of the facts of the case, there shall be a direction to the Additional Tahasildar to take appropriate decision, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the 5th respondent and to any other affected persons. Needful shall be done within a period of 3 months of receipt of copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall file proper application before the Additional Tahasildar. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge.
ami/ //True copy// P.A.to Judge