High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24536/2015disposed of

Sebastian George v. The Tahsildar

2015-09-09Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24536 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------

1. SEBASTIAN GEORGE, VELLUKUNNEL PUTHIYAPARAMBIL, SURYANELLY, IDUKKI.

2. ROSAMMA SEBASTIAN, W/O.SEBASTIAN GEORGE, VELLUKUNNEL PUTHIYAPARAMBIIL, SURYANELLY, IDUKKI.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN SMT.PREETHI KESAVAN SRI.T.C.KRISHNA SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR SMT.ASHA K.SHENOY SRI.PRATAP ABRAHAM VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, UDUMBANCHOLA, NEDUMKANDAM P.O., IDUKKI -685 553

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI, PIN -685 603 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 24536 of 2015 (N) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 27.07.1992 OF RAJAKUMARY SUB REGISTRY P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF TAX DATED 12.11.2007 ISSUED IN THE NAME OF THE 1ST PETITIONER & ORS P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.03.2014 SUBMITTTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER & OTHERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 20.03.2014 OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHINNAKKANAL.

P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.06.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 04.02.2015 FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/2/2015 FROM THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 24536 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners aggrieved by the non acceptance of land tax, have approached this Court.

As seen from Ext.P6, the land tax was not received from the petitioner on account of pendency of the ceiling proceedings. 3.

If the petitioners are in possession of the land referred in Ext.P6, necessary land tax shall be received from the petitioners subject to out come of any ceiling proceedings. Needful shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE