High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24556/2015disposed of

K.Prasanna Kumar v. The Transport Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram

2015-08-12Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/21ST SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24556 of 2015 (T) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- K.PRASANNAKUMAR, KANDENKAVIL HOUSE, MARATHAKKARA P.O, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY A.A.JOHAR, S/O.ANTO , AINIKKAL HOUSE, MARATHAKKARA P.O., OLLUR, THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.

2. TH DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL ZONE-II, ERNAKULAM- 682 030.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, ERNAKULAM- 682 030.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 24556 of 2015 (T) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.6922 OF 2015 DATED 05-03-2005.

EXHIBIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 24-03-2015.

EXHIBIT P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.11371 OF 2015 DATED 09-04-2015.

EXHIBIT P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT NO.C1/3788/2015/E DATED 02-05-2015.

EXHIBIT P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER IN APPEAL NO.C-2027/CZ-II/2015 DATED 24-07-2015.

EXHIBIT P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION AND THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.24556 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 12th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, challenging Ext.P5 order, preferred Ext.P6 revision petition before the first respondent. Considering the pendency of revision petition as above, the first respondent is directed to dispose the same within two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till the disposal of the revision petition, all recovery shall be deferred.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln