Baiju M.M. v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/28TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24773 of 2015 (V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- BAIJU M.M., AGED 26 YEARS, S/O MR. MATHEW, OFFICE AT IST FLOOR, MATHA BUILDING, NEAR VYTTILA HUB, EROOR, KOCHI-682 024.
BY ADVS.SMT.V.J.RUBY SMT.V.K.REEBA RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY C.I OF POLICE, MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE, MANNUTHY POLIE STATION, GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 24773 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT. EXHIBIT P2: BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. EXHIBIT P3: NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES PALAKKAD DATED 30.9.2014. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION LETTER FROM THRISSUR CORPORATION DATED 12.9.2014 AND ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF REPORT FROM POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DATED 24.6.2015.
EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF SITE LOCATION PLAN.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.
Msv/
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.
& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
================ W.P. (C) No. 24773 of 2015 ================ Dated this, the 19th day of August, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, C.J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
2.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for police protection. Petitioner's case in the writ petition is that petitioner is a contractor, who is conducting contractual work all over Kerala. He submits that with regard to his work at Thrissur, obstructions have been created by local persons, who threatened the petitioner that they shall not permit him to carry on the work, which is creating severe pollution problems. Allegation is also made that they demanded nokku coolie.
3.
Learned Government Pleader submits that no complaint has been received from the petitioner at the concerned Police Station. Hence, police could not verify about the allegation of the petitioner.
W.P(C) No.24773/15 -:2:- We, therefore, close the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate complaint before the Sub Inspector of Police, who may look into the matter.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PS to Judge