← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24887/2015disposed of

Manager v. State Of Keala

2015-08-17Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/26TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24887 of 2015 (I) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- 1.

MANAGER AGED 38 YEARS, SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM BEETHU BALAN, H.S.A (ENGLISH) SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 3.

REMA R.B. UPSA, SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 4.

SHIJI E.K., H.S.A (MALAYALAM) SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 5.

MANONJA DEVI M.K. AS LG (HINDI) SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 6.

DHANYA P.S. UPSA, SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 7.

DISHA DAVIS KOOTUNGAL, H.S.A. (ENGLISH) SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 8.

MAYA P.V., UPSA, SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 9.

BINU N.N. UPSA SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OKKAL, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.ANISON SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI SMT.P.A.RINUSA

RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KEALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001 3.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 030 4.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 666 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. LOWSY A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:\

WP(C).No. 24887 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.EC(2)/23939/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 15.10.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 24.01.2013.

EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.EC(2)/21543/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 24.06.2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DAED 24.01.2013.

EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.EC(2)/21584/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 15.10.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 10.12.2012.

EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.EC(2)/23712/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 21.08.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 24.01.2013.

EXT.P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EC(2)/23941/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 03.11.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P10 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 24.01.2013.

EXT.P11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.EC(2)/23940/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 09.10.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P12 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 24.01.2013.

EXT.P13 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.EC(2)/21549/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 26.09.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P14 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 24.01.2013.

EXT.P15 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EC(2)/21546/2012/DPI/K.DIS DATED 29.10.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P16 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 24.01.2013.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 24887 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 17th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The 1st petitioner, who is the manager of an aided school and the petitioners 2 to 9, who are the teachers working in the said school, are aggrieved by the denial of approval to their appointments on regular scale of pay basis. It is the case of the petitioners that, while the appointments were approved by the 4th respondent, the same was done only on daily wage basis from the date of appointments till the end of the academic year and only thereafter on regular basis from the next academic year. Highlighting their grievance, they have preferred Exts.P2, P4, P6, P8, P10, P12, P14 and P16 revision petitions before the 1st respondent and the limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the said revision petitions expeditiously, after hearing the petitioners. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ

-2W.P.(C). No. 24887 of 2015 petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 to P16 revision petitions, after hearing the petitioners, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for further action.

Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das