A.R.Jiolsana v. The Tahsildar, Kodungallur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 24939 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- A.R.JIOLSANA, D/O. LATE KAMALAKSHY AMMA, AMBAT HOUSE, PERINJANAM P.O., KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, RAVEENDRANATHAN, S/O. MADHAVA MENON, AMBAT HOUSE, PERINJANAM P.O., KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.RAJESH SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------------------
1. THE TAHSILDAR, THALUK OFFICE, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-608664.
2. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, THALUK OFFICE, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN -608664.
3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOOLIMUTTOM VILLAGE OFFICE, KODUNGALLUR THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680691.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 24939 of 2015 (N) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 1230/1957 DATED 3-9-1957 IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER'S MOTHER.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 12-2-2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.24939 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court on account of delay in demarcating the property owned by her in Resurvey No.9/7 situated in Paappnivattom Village, Kodungallur Taluk. The petitioner refers to the communication issued by the Village Officer. It refers to placing the matter before the Additional Tahsildar, Kodungallur. That communication, in fact, related to the payment of land tax by the petitioner. It appears that on account of delay in identification of the property, the land tax is not received. This Court is of the view that the petitioner shall approach the first respondent with an application to demarcate the property based on the title deed. This shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Thereafter, the first respondent shall take appropriate steps to demarcate the property and issue a sketch to the petitioner. Based on the above, the land
W.P.(C) No.24939 of 2015 2 tax can be accepted from the petitioner. Needful shall be done within three months thereon after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all other affected persons. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln