C.P.Rasitha Kumari v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/27TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25074 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- C.P.RASITHA KUMARI AGED 36 YEARS WIFE OF P.V. SAJATH, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT MMUP SCHOOL, KUPPAM PO, KUPPAM, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- 1.
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001 2.
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014 3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 002 4.
THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TALIPARAMBA NORTH, PO TALIPARAMBA KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 141 5.
THE MANAGER, MMUP SCHOOL, KUPPAM PO KUPPAM, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 502 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 25074 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ---------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 30.07.2012 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER 2014-2015 DATED 15.07.2014 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 02.06.2014.
EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF SMT. T.K. BHANUMATHI DATED 01.06.20140.
EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.C/300/2015 OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 08.05.2015 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS./C/2374/14 DATED 06.06.2015 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 25074 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 18th day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by the denial of approval to her appointment as UPSA, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P7 revision in terms of Rule 8A of Chapter XIV A of KER, before the 2nd respondent and the limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 revision petition, expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner. 2.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 revision petition, after hearing the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action.
Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das