M.S.Thaha v. The Recovery Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25108 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
--------------------- M.S.THAHA S/O. MEERA SAHIB, VELIYIL PARAMBIL HOUSE KAVANADU P.O., KUREEPUZHACHERIYIL, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI SRI.RAHUL VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------
1. THE RECOVERY OFFICER DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (KERALA & LAKSHADWEEP) VIIITH FLOOR, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD BUILDING PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM - 682 036.
2. THE MANAGER THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., KOLLAM - 691 001.
R1 BY ADVS. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASGI SMT.MINI RAJAN, CGC R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.JOHN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn ...2/-
WP(C).No. 25108 of 2015 (K) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------------- EXT. P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT DT. 22.01.2005.
EXT. P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 25.5.1996.
EXT. P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN IN RESPECT OF THE UNIT BY NAME 'SAHIB MATCH WORKS'.
EXT. P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DT. 31.8.1992. EXT. P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DT. 23.2.2007 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM.
EXT. P6 - TRUE COPY OF THE PROCLAMATION FOR SALE DT. 18.2.2010 ISSUED BY THE RECOVERY OFFICER.
EXT. P7 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 04.10.2013 IN WPC NO. 23426/2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. EXT. P8 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 21.7.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J ----------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 25108 of 2015 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner claims to be in possession of the portion of the property mortgaged with the Bank by the borrower. The petitioner, admittedly, has not title to the property. The petitioner claimed that it is based on the agreement with legal heirs of the borrower. The petitioner submitted that he is prepared to discharge the liability to the extent value of the property held by him.
2. The petitioner relies upon the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C). No.4386/2014 dated 24.07.2015.
3. The learned counsel for the Bank opposed the prayer of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no locus standi and the petitioner has not crystallized right over the property.
4. However, in view of the fact that the petitioner is only a request for discharging the liability to the extent value of the property claimed by him as per Ext.P1 without considering the issue relating to the right of interest of the
W.P.(C).No. 25108 of 2015 -2petitioner, if the petitioner prepares to pay the proportionate value of the property, the Bank shall accept the same. For all other purpose implementing the above directions, the judgment in W.P.(C).No.4386/2014 shall be followed. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr