Daisamma Joseph v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/27TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25148 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- DAISAMMA JOSEPH AGED 56 YEARS SEWING TEACHER, MANALADIL PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, MANIMALA PO KOTTAYAM - 686 543 BY ADVS.SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.S.GANESH RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- 1.
THE STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENENRAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DPI, JAGATHIM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, DD OFFICE KOTTAYAM -686 001 4.
THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, DEO OFFICE KANJIRAPPALLY, AT PONKUNNAM P, KOTTAYAM - 686 506 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 25148 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- -------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF GO(P) No.226/2002/G.EDN. DATED 14.08.2003 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) 21697 OF 2014 DATED 26.08.2014 EXT.P3 TRUE COPYOF THE ORDER OF DPI DATED 22.12.2014 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 05.01.2015 FILED BY THE MANAGER.
EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 12.01.2015.
EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 24.07.2015 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 25148 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 18th day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who was working as Specialist Teacher, and who has since been retrenched, is aggrieved by the order retrenching her from service. In this connection Exts.P4 and P5 revision petitions, filed by the manager and the petitioner respectively, are pending consideration before the 1st respondent. The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to expeditiously dispose the said revision petitions, after hearing the petitioner as well as the manager of the school.
2.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P4 and P5 revision petitions, after hearing the
-2W.P.(C). No. 25148 of 2015 petitioner as well as the manager of the school, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das