High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25251/2015disposed of

M/S.Hekur Steel & Glass Contractors v. The Commercial Tax Officer (Wc & Lt)

2015-08-19Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/28TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25251 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- M/S.HEKUR STEEL & GLASS CONTRACTORS, NELLIKKUNNU, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAING PARTNER, ROYCE KIZHAKOODEN.

BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (WC & LT), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR - 680 004.

2. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR - 680 004.

3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR - 680 004.

4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), TALUK OFFICE, THRISSUR 20.

BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 25251 of 2015 (F) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.

COPY OF PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY IST RESPONDENT DATED 4.9.12.

EXHIBIT P2.

COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.3.15.

EXHIBIT P3.

COPY OF REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 18.4.15.

EXHIBIT P4.

COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 18.4.15.

EXHIBIT P5.

COPY OF NOTICE IN FORM NO.1 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.8.15.

EXHIBIT P6.

COPY OF NOTICE IN FORM NO.10 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.8.15.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.25251 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 19th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, impugning Ext.P2 order, filed Ext.P3 revision petition before the third respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P4 stay application.

2. Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to consider the stay application within a period of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till the disposal of the stay application, all recovery proceedings based on Ext.P1 order shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln