Kumari Priya v. The District Superintendent Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/28TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25282 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- KUMARI PRIYA, W/O.ANIL, USHAS, VETTIMONKONAM, OTTOOR VILLAGE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR SRI.G.BIJU RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------- 1.
THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 101.
3.
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 141.
4.
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLAMBALAM POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 101.
5.
JAYARAJ, S/O.RAGHAVA KURUP, ANIZHAM, VETTIMONKONAM, OTTOOR, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 101.
6.
RAGHAVA KURUP, ANIZHAM, VETTIMONKONAM, OTTOOR, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 101.
R1 TO R4 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 25282 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGING THE COMPLAINT ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DTD.2.5.2015.
EXT.P1(a): TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P1: EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD.11.7.2015 GIVEN TO 2ND RESPONDENT BY PETITIONER.
EXT.P2(a): TRUE COPY OF THE TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P2. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SENT TO FIRST RESPONDENT BY PETITIONER DTD.26.7.2015.
EXT.P3(a): TRUE COPY OF THE TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.
Msv/
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.25282 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of August 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Attorney. No notice is being issued to respondents 5 and 6 in view of the judgment being passed today.
2.
Petitioner's case is that she has obtained an interim injunction in O.S.No.211/2015 against respondents 5 and 6. It is, however, submitted that respondents 5 and 6 have trespassed into the petitioner's building and created disturbance with regard to which petitioner has filed a complaint.
3.
Learned State Attorney, on instructions, submits that after receiving the complaint from the petitioner, respondents 5 and 6 were called at the police station and they were warned not to create any law and order problem. It is submitted that police authorities shall take appropriate action, if any law and order situation arises.
Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned State Attorney, this writ petition is closed.
(sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr