← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25566/2014disposed of

R.Baburaj v. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 25566 of 2014 (U) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- R.BABURAJ S/O. RAMAN PILLAI, RETIRED DRIVER K.S.R.T.C KUMILY DEPOT, IDUKKI DISTRICT RESIDING AT PALATHINKAL VEEDU OPPOSITE KAMACHIPURAM PETROL PUMP, KAMACHIPURAM P.O. THENI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

2. THE PERSONNEL OFFICER (PENSION) KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRNASPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

3. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KUMILY DEPOT, KUMILY P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 509. BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 25566 of 2014 (U) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM NO. E1/004/11/KMLY DT. 30.03.2011 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P2 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. E1/04/11/KMLY DT. 03.11.11 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

P2(a) - THE TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P2 DOCUMENT. P3 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 01.07.13 IN WPC NO. 14191 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 25566 OF 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The issue is covered by Ext. P3 judgment in W.P.(C). No. 14191/2013. Therefore the claim for leave without allowance has to be reconsidered in the light of Ext. P3 judgment. Ext. P2 order declining relief to the petitioner in this regard is accordingly quashed.

2.

The respondents are directed to reconsider the issue in the light of Ext. P3 judgment within a period of three months. The needful shall be done with notice to the petitioner and all other contentions are left open.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE