High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25406/2015disposed of

Thahseena Hyder K.P v. District Education Officer

2015-08-19Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/28TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 25406 OF 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- THAHSEENA HYDER K.P UPSA, CRESCENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL ADAKKAKUNDU.P.O., (VIA)KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM.

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION MALAPPURAM.

3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN-695 001.

4. MANAGER CRESCENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, ADAKKAKUNDU.P.O. (VIA)KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 25406 OF 2015 (A) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2010 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

P2- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 01.06.2010 SENT BY THE MANAGER TO THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SEEKING APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER FROM HER INITIAL APPOINTMENT.

P3- TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 10.08.2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

P4- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER GO(P)NO.213/2015/G.EDN. DATED 06.08.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.25406 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 19th day of August, 2015 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by the denial of approval to her appointment as UPSA for the period from 01.06.2010 to 31.05.2011, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 revision petition before the 3rd respondent. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition expeditiously after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition preferred by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns