← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25420/2015disposed of

K S Thahir v. The Commercial Tax Officer Pala

2015-08-21Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2015/30TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25420 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- K.S. THAHIR MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.A.B.C. TIMBERS NA 3/21 WARD NO. III, ERATTUPETTA.

BY ADVS.SRI.RAJU K.MATHEWS SRI.SEBASTIAN JOSEPH (KURISUMMOOTTIL) RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 001.

2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, PALA PIN-686 575.

R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 25420 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED NIL OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED ON 23/5/15 PURSUANT TO EXT.P1.

EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DT. NIL OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4:

A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. 23/5/15 PURSUANT TO EXT.P3.

EXT.5:

A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. 7/8/15 DEMANDING THE PENALTY AMOUNT OR RS. 11,72,352/- FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 2015.

EXT. P6:

A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. 7/8/15.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ----------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.25420 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 21st day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, aggrieved by penalty orders, has approached this Court. The petitioner submits that he is now contemplating to file a revision against the penalty orders.

In that view of the matter, if the petitioner files revision within three weeks from today, the recovery proceedings shall be deferred for a period of two months. The petitioner shall also move an application for stay within the time. If the application for stay is filed, that shall also be considered within the outer limit as above. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln