← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25476/2015disposed of

Rose Daleema v. Repco Home Finance Limited

2015-08-21Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2015/30TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25476 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------

1. ROSE DALEEMA, AGED 30 YEARS, W/O.SHAIJU, VELIYIL HOUSE, KATTOOR POST, KALAVOOR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT -688 546.

2. V.S. SHAIJU,AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.SHANMUGHAN, VELIYIL HOUSE, KATTOOR POST, KALAVOOR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT -688 546.

BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. REPCO HOME FINANCE LIMITED., KOTTAYAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 12/12750, ERAJILKADAVU ROAD,KOTTAYAM -686 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER K.S.KANNAN.

2. AUTHORISED OFFICER, REPCO HOME FINANCE LIMITED, DOOR NO. 12/12750, ERAJILKADAVU ROAD, KOTTAYAM- 686 001.

R1 & R2 BY SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 25476 of 2015 (H) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - PHOTO COPY OF MC 286/2015 OF CJM COURT, ALAPPUZHA. P2 - PHOTO COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 10-8-2015 ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.25476 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 21st day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioners availed a housing loan from the respondent Bank. The only prayer of the petitioners is that they may be permitted to clear the overdue amount and the respondents may be directed to regularize the account.

2.

Learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the overdue amount is around Rs.67,000/-. Considering the above, the petitioners are permitted to clear the overdue amount in three instalments along with regular EMI from the month of September, 2015 onwards. If the petitioners clear the overdue amount, the respondents shall regularize the account. If the petitioners commit default in remitting anyone of the instalments, the respondents are free to proceed against them in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln