← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25507/2015closed

M.K.Sundaran Pillai v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-11-03Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25507 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------ M.K. SUNDARAN PILLAI, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN PILLAI, SHOBHANA MANDIRAM, ASRAMAM P.O., KOLLAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH SRI.K.NANDAKUMAR SMT.V.A.HARITHA SMT.MARY RESHMA GEORGE SMT.P.M.MAZNA MANSOOR RESPONDENTS :

-----------------------

1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM 691 001.

2. P.O. THOMAS S/O.OOMMEN, PANANGAT BUNGALOW, PUNNUKKANNOOR CHERRY PUNUKANNOOR P.O, ELAMPALLOOR, KOLLAM 691 001. R1 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.I. DAVIS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 25507 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

COPY OF THE ORDER OF INJUNCTION PASSED IN OS 381/13 DATED 4.12.13.

EXHIBIT P2:

COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE LOK ADALATH IN OS 381/13 DATED 17.6.15 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE bp

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 25507 of 2015 ================== Dated this, the 3rd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

Petitioner has approached this Court alleging harassment by the police. It is stated that the police was unnecessarily interfering in a civil dispute.

2.

Learned Government Pleader on instructions would submit that the complaint came to be made by the 2nd respondent stating that the petitioner has violated an order of interim injunction. On enquiry, it was understood that the injunction was only regarding alienation of the property. Hence, the 2nd respondent was directed to approach the Civil Court for appropriate orders and the police had closed the complaint. In the light of the aforesaid factual situation, we do not think that there is any harassment by the police. Accordingly, we close the writ petition.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp 3/11/2015