High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25557/2015disposed of

Paulose v. The Deputy Collector (Revenue Recovery)

2015-08-20Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25557 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- PAULOSE AGED 70 YEARS, S/O. VARGHESE, KOLLAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, VELLATHOOVAL IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN SRI.RAJESH RAJAN RESPONDENTS :

---------------------------

1. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (REVENUE RECOVERY) TALUK OFFICE, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 602.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER KUNCHITHANNY, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 602.

R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 25557 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21-12-2010 IN CRIMINAL M.C. NO.4660/2010.

EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 27-3-2014 UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 11-7-2012 ISSUED FROM THE KUNCHITHANNY VILLAGE OFFICE.

EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 10-08-2015 ISSUED BY THE MEDICAL OFFICER IN CHARFE OF CHITHIRAPURAM COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 25557 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenging revenue recovery proceedings to recover the amount due based on the forfeiture of the bond executed by him before the Additional Sessions Court, Thodupuzha has approached this Court.

2. The only prayer before this Court is that he may be given instalment facility to discharge the entire liability.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the following directions are issued :

i) The petitioner is permitted to discharge the entire liability in ten equal monthly instalments starting from 14.09.2015.

ii) If the petitioner commits default in remitting any one of the instalments, the respondents are free to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr