M.V.Paily v. Local Level Monitoring Committee
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/16TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25598 of 2015 (Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- M.V.PAILY, MUNDETHUKUDY HOUSE, KEEZHILLAM P.O., RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.SHAJI THOMAS SRI.GEORGE PULIKUTHIYIL SRI.B.RAJESH (KOTTAYAM) SRI.H.KIRAN RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, (CONSTITUTED UNDER THE KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WET LAND ACT 2008), RAYAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE PRESIDENT, RAYAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, RAYAMANGALAM P.O., KURUPPAMPADI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 545.
2. RAYAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, RAYAMANGALAM P.O, KURUPPAMPADI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 545, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICE (KRISHI BHAVAN), RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KEEZHILLAM P.O., PIN - 683 541.
4. KEEZHILLAM RUBBER UDPADAKA SANGHAM, KEEZHILLAM P.O., KEEZHILLAM, PIN - 683 541.
R3 BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.SOYUZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 25598 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE LATEST TAX RECEIPT DATED 22.07.2014 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE, RAYAMANGALAM.
P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 01.07.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.25598 of 2015 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of September, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached the Local Level Monitoring Committee by Ext.P2 application. The 3rd respondent is the convenor of the Local Level Monitoring Committee.
2. The petitioner's case is that the land covered by Ext.P2 is a converted land much before the enactment of Act 28 of 2008. Therefore, it cannot be treated as a paddy or wet land under the Act.
3. In view of the pendency of Ext.P2, there shall be a direction to the Local Level Monitoring Committee to conduct site inspection in the presence of the petitioner and find out whether the description of the land can be treated as a paddy or wet land as per the entries in the draft Data Bank. If the land cannot be treated as paddy or wet land as on the date of enactment of Act 28 of 2008, necessary steps
W.P.(C)No.25598 of 2015 shall be taken to correct the entries in the draft Data Bank. Needful shall be done within a period of 2 months of receipt of copy of this judgment.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge.
ami/ //True copy// P.A.to Judge