K.Padmavathy v. Joint Registrar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/29TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 28281 of 2013 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------ K.PADMAVATHY,W/O C.KARUPPA SWAMY, THEKKEPAVADIYIL, KOLLANGODE (PO) PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 506.

BY ADV. SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO.OP.SOCIETIES, PALAKKAD-678 014.

2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO.OP.SOCIETIES, (GENERAL), CHITTUR-678 501.

3. K.P.GANGADHARA MENON, S/O T.P.VELUKKUTTY MENON, AMBADY, NEW VILLAGE, KOLLANGODE-678 506.

R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 28281 of 2013 (I) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30/7/2013 IN WPC 18816/2013. EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22/10/2013 IN WPC 25146/2013. EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30/9/2013.

EXT.P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 8/10/2013.

EXT.P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 30/10/2013.

EXT.P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11/11/2013.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J --------------------------------------------- WPC No.28281 of 2013 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

Apprehending coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P6 notice, the petitioner has come up before this Court. Today when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition could be closed leaving open the second prayer to be decided in appropriate proceedings. Therefore, this writ petition is closed leaving open the second prayer of the petitioner to be decided in appropriate proceedings. Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE css/ true copy P.S.TO JUDGE