High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25632/2015disposed of

Elizabeth v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-11Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/20TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25632 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- ELIZABETH, AGED 44 YEARS W/O.CLEETUS, PUTHENPADATH HOUSE, KALATHRA DESOM MUNDAMVELI PO, PIN 682507 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION PO, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682030

3. CHALLANAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH ANDIKKADAVU PO, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682008

4. THE SECRETARY CHELLANAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ANDIKKADAVU PO ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682008 R3 & 4 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY R3 & 4 BY ADV. SRI.SANIL JOSE R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 25632 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- P1:TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 24.07.2015 P2:TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 17.09.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

----------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.25632 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 11th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks a breathing time to vacate the premises which is alleged to have been trespassed upon. The petitioner has in Ext.R3(c) application undertook to vacate the premises by 20.8.2015 which time has already expired.

2. Time is however granted till 31.10.2015 to vacate the premises by the petitioner taking note of the peculiar circumstances in which she is placed. The respondents are at liberty to proceed with the coercive process if the premises is not vacated by the petitioner by 31.10.2015.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.