← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25688/2015disposed of

K. Liza Peter v. The State Of Kerala

2015-08-20Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25688 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K. LIZA PETER AGED 51 YEARS WIFE OF VARGHESE, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT MTS SCHOOL, CHOWANNUR, KUNNAMKULAM EDUCATIONAL SUB DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 503 3.

THE MANAGER, MTS SCHOOL, CHOWANNUR KUNNAMKULAM SUB DISTRICT THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 517 4.

SRI. K.G. SAIJU, MTS SCHOOL, CHOWANNUR KUNNAMKULAM SUB DISTRICT THRISSUR - 680 517 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 25688 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPYOF THE SENIORITY LIST EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2009(4) KLT 1 (FB) DATED 09.09.2009 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01.04.2015 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) No. 13731/2015-N DATED 08.05.2015 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.E-1826/15 DATED 27.07.2015 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 01.08.2015 WITHOUT EXHIBITS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 25688 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 20th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who seeks appointment as Headmistress, is aggrieved by the appointment of the 4th respondent as Headmistress. It is the case of the petitioner that the 4th respondent is junior to the petitioner and in this connection she has preferred Ext.P6 revision petition before the 1st respondent. The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 revision petition, expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 revision petition, after hearing the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy

-2W.P.(C). No.25688 of 2015 of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for further action.

Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das