S.Koulath v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25697 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- S.KOULATH AGED 38 YEARS W/O.M.K.NAZAR, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MALAYALAM) LAJNATHUL MUHAMMADIYA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL ALAPPUZHA-688 001.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001.

4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONALOFFICER, ALAPPUZHA-688 011.

5. THE MANAGER LAJNATHUL MUHAMMADIYA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL ALAPPUZHA-688 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.S. SAJEEV THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 25697 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1-6-2005.

P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 17-1-2006.

P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P)NO.46/2006/G.EDN DATED 1-2-2006 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1-6-2005 AND APPROVAL THEREOF P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE GO(RT)NO.3445/2014/G.EDN DATED 27-8-2014 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 7-8-2015.

P7 :

TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER 2005-2006 DATED 1-10-2005. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 25697 of 2015 (J) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P6 Revision Petition has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the Revision Petition, if received in original, in accordance with law, within four months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj