Rajeev v. The Director Of Industries & Registrar Of Industrial Co-Operative Societies
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937 W.P. (C) No. 25982 OF 2014 (W) PETITIONERS : - ------------------------
1. RAJEEV, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.LATE GANGADHARAN, NELLIVILA VEEDU, KUZHIYAM THEKKU, CHANDANATHOPPU P.O., KOLLAM.
2. CLEETUS, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.LATE LAWRENCE, KOCHUVILA VADAKKATHIL, VELLIMON WEST P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.BINU GEORGE SMT.HEMALATHA RESPONDENTS : - ---------------------------
1. THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES & REGISTRAR OF INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695033.
2. THE PERINAD CASHEW WORKERS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIEITY LTD., NO.S IND (Q) NO.349, CHEMMAKKAD P.O., KOLLAM, PIN 691601, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR, THE DISTRICT MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTRE, ASRAMOM, KOLLAM.
3. THE KERALA STATE CASHEW WORKERS APEX INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MUNDAKKAL, KOLLAM, PIN 691001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
4. MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE CASHEW WORKERS APEX INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MUNDAKKAL, KOLLAM, PIN 691001.
WP(C).No. 25982 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------------------
5. MANAGER THE PERINAD CASHEW WORKERS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE ` SOCIETY LTD., NO.S IND (Q) NO.349,, CHEMMAKKAD P.O., KOLLAM, PIN 691601.
6. MANAGER, THE KERALA STATE CASHES WORKERS APEX INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MUNDAKKAL, KOLLAM, PIN 691001.
R3 BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR R3 BY ADV. SRI.JELSON J.EDAMPADAM BY Sr. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SHYSON P. MANGUZHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DMR/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 25982 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition is not pressed. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-