High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28475/2013dismissed as infructuous

T P Mariya v. Kerala State Election Commission

2015-12-21Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28475 of 2013 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- T P MARIYA KOONDOOKARA THODI HOUSE, KANAYAM P.O, 679192 SHORNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR SRI.P.K.ABDU RAHEEM RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 695033 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2. R. RAJAN, S/O KRISHNAN, POOPATTA, KANAYAM P.O SHORNUR II, VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 679192 R1 BY ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM R2 BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) R2 BY ADV. SMT.P.R.REENA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2112-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28475 of 2013 (H) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 13-07-2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN OBJECTION DATED 01-12-2012 IN OP 66/2012 BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26-05-2012 OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, SHORNUR MUNICIPALITY ISSUED OT THE SRI S.

KRISHNA DAS EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF THE SECRETRY OF SHORNUR MUNICIPLAITY IN OP 66/2012 BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26-05-2012 OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER SHORNUR MUNICIPALITY TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE ENCLOSURE EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26-05-2012 OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, SHORNUR MUNICIPALITY, TO THE SRI.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.28475 of 2013 --------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The term is over and the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

sks