High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25906/2015disposed of

Shareef A. v. Assistant Educational Officer

2015-08-21Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2015/30TH SRAVANA, 1937H WP(C).No. 25906 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- SHAREEF A.,S/O.AHAMMAD, UPSA, A.M.UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL MAMPADU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NILAMBOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.679 325

2. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.679 325

3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERTAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN:695001

4. MANAGER, A.M. UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, MAMPADU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.676 542 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 25906 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2010 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 13.09.2010 P3- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED NIL PREFERRED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 2ND RSPONDENT EXT.P4:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5:TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 10.08.2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.25906 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 21st day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, who has been appointed to a regular vacancy of UPSA, is aggrieved by the denial of approval to the said appointment. In this connection, he has preferred Ext.P5 revision petition before the 3rd respondent. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 revision petition expeditiously after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 revision petition preferred by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns