Harris Choori v. The State Election Commission
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/12TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25999 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------- HARRIS CHOORI, AGED 46 YEARS C.H.VILLA, PARAKKATTA, R.D.NAGAR P.O.
KASARAGOD 671 124.
BY ADV. SRI.SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 675001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KASARAGOD-671121.
3. THE ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER MADHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KASARAGODE DISTRICT, 671124.
4. THE MADHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT KASARAGOD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 671124.
ADDL. 5. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, KASARGOD.
(ADDL. R5 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER JUDGMENT DATED 3.9.2015 IN THE WRIT PETITION. ) R1 BY ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMMISSION R BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 25999 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE ORDER DATED 30/06/2015 OF THE STATE DELIMITATION COMMISSION. EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE VOTERS LIST OF WARD NO.17 (ULIYATHADULLA) PART 1 OF MADHUR PANCHAYAT.
EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 07/07/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 17/07/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION NO.B4.4715/15 DATED 24/07/2015 OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P6: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION NO.B4.4485/15 DATED 24/07/2015 OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.25999 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The first respondent submits that the Deputy Director of Panchayats, Kasargod has already been alerted as regards the discrepancy in the electoral roll as espoused in Exts.P3 and P4 representations. The petitioner is free to file a supplemental representation to the Deputy Director of Panchayats, Kasargod in this regard within two weeks.
2.
The Deputy Director of Panchayats, Kasargod is suo-motu impleaded as the fifth respondent in this writ petition. The fifth respondent is directed to deal with the issue and take the proceedings to a logical end. The same shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.